Friday, November 02, 2007

Dog or corpse

From Steve & Lou's brilliant birthday arose a question from murky depths... and there's some priceless reactions in here:

WARNING: This is sick.



Cudos to Rich for a superb editing job. By far the funniest thing today.

4 comments:

mrs23 said...

Dog or Corpse?
Who is the sick bastard that came up with that idea? You created some disgusting images in my head. Shame on you!

;o)

eD said...

Haha!! Yeah - sick, i should have put a warning up. Luckily I can exhonourate myself for coming up with the idea, nothing to do with me.

But, now that it's out there:

dog or corpse? ;-)

loo said...

Only just watched this, and it crashed my browser twice.

Weirdly, I was thinking about this issue the other day, in relation to informed consent.

With a corpse, you don't have a guarantee that consent is still given, even if the person had consented during their lifetime.

As a meat-eater, I generally don't seek consent from animals before exerting my will over them, so I reckon fucking a dog would be more ethical than fucking a corpse.

I'll take a great dane please.

loo said...

I learned from an 'educational video' on teh interwebz that you have to put thick socks on the dog'd front paws, otherwise it can claw up your back.